Reviewing the Literature
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Name: NURS_6053_Module04_Week09_Assignment_Rubric
· Grid View
· List View
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Part 1: Work Environment Assessment · Complete the Work Environment Assessment Template. · Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace. · Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea that you believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed. · Explain what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of your workplace.
45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
An accurate, detailed, and completed Work Environment Assessment Template is provided. The responses accurately and thoroughly describe in detail the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace. The responses accurately and clearly identify two surprising things about the results and thoroughly describe in detail at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed. The responses accurately and thoroughly explain in detail what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of a workplace.
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
An accurate and completed Work Environment Assessment Template is provided. The responses accurately describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace. The responses accurately identify two surprising things about the results and describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed. The responses accurately explain what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of a workplace.
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
A completed Work Environment Assessment Template that is vague or inaccurate is provided. The responses describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace that is vague or inaccurate. The responses identify two surprising things about the results and describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed that is vague or inaccurate. The responses explain what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of a workplace that is vague or inaccurate.
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
A vague and inaccurate Work Environment Assessment Template is provided, or is missing. The responses describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. The responses identify two surprising things about the results and describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. The responses explain what the results of the assessment suggest about the health and civility of a workplace that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
Part 2: Reviewing the Literature · Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article you selected. · Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment. · Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article to improve organizational health and/or stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples.
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The responses accurately and thoroughly describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected. The responses accurately and completely explain in detail how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment. The responses accurately and thoroughly explain in detail how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or stronger work teams. Specific and detailed examples are provided which fully support the responses.
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
The responses accurately describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected. The responses accurately explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment. The responses accurately explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or stronger work teams. Specific examples are provided which may support the responses.
11 (11%) – 11 (11%)
The responses describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected that is vague or inaccurate. The responses explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment that is vague or inaccurate. The responses explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams that is vague or inaccurate. Vague or inaccurate examples are provided which may support the responses.
0 (0%) – 10 (10%)
The responses describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. The responses explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. The responses explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Specific examples are not provided to support the responses.
Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams · Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment. · Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The responses clearly and thoroughly recommend in detail at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment. The responses clearly and thoroughly recommend in detail at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment.
16 (16%) – 19 (19%)
The responses accurately recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment. The responses accurately recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment.
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague or inaccurate, or only recommends one strategy. The responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague or inaccurate, or only recommends one strategy.
0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague and inaccurate, only recommends one strategy, or is missing. The responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague and inaccurate, only recommends one strategy, or is missing.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was
