Policy Implementation
| HGMT 310 Assignment #2 | |
| Student Name: | Type your name here. |
| Assignment #2 Title: | Provide a short name and the official title of the legislation. |
| Agency Responsible: | Identify the agency and subunit (such as a bureau or office) responsible for implementing the policy. If multiple agencies are involved indicate who is responsible for what. |
| Enforcement: | What federal or state agency is responsible for enforcement? What are the key areas for enforcement? |
| Implementation: | How is the legislation implemented? What federal or state agency is charged with its implementation? Are local public health departments involved? Are collaborating organizations engaged to achieve the aims of the policy? Are citizen’s involved? Are health provider organizations? Are grants awarded? |
| Impact on Health Service Organizations: | What does a Health Care Manager need to know about this legislation and the related implementation? Include five bullets of how this legislation impacts health services organizations operating in your home state. |
| Resource: | What resource would a health organization utilize to find updates regarding the impact policies have on them? |
| Criteria | Outstanding | Superior | Good | Below Standard | Failure |
| Critical Thinking/Reasoning | 35 points
demonstrates a high degree of critical thinking, is consistent in accurately interpreting questions & material; provides solid assumptions, reasoning & claims; provides thorough analysis & evaluation with sound conclusions |
31.5 points
shows good critical thinking; accurately interprets most questions & material; usually identifies relevant arguments/reasoning/claims; offers good analysis & evaluation with fairly sound conclusions |
24.5 points
shows occasional critical thinking; questions & material is at times accurately interpreted; arguments/reasoning/claims are occasionally explained; offers fair analysis & evaluation with a conclusion |
21 points
shows little critical thinking, misinterprets questions or material; ignores or superficially evaluates; justifies little and seldom explains reasoning; draws unwarranted conclusions |
0 points
lacks critical thinking consistently offers biased interpretations; ignores or superficially evaluates; argues using poor reasoning, and/or unwarranted claims |
| Application of Concepts/Development | 35 points
arguments or positions are well-supported with evidence from the readings/experience; ideas go beyond the course material and recognize implications and extensions of the material and concepts |
31.5 points
arguments or positions are mostly supported by evidence from the readings and course content; ideas presented demonstrate student’s understanding of the material and concepts |
24.5 points
arguments are more often based on opinion or unclear views than on position grounded in the readings of material or external sources of material |
21 points
arguments are frequently illogical and unsubstantiated; student may resort to ad hominem attacks on the author instead of making meaningful application of the material |
5 points
There is no meaningful attempt to explain or support ideas |
| Attention to Instructions | 15 points
demonstrated full understanding of requirements; responded to each aspect of assignment |
13.5 points
demonstrated understanding of requirements; missed one minor aspect of assignment |
10.5 points
demonstrated some understanding of requirements; missed a key element or two minor aspects of assignment |
9 points
failed to show a firm understanding of requirements; missed two key elements or several minor aspects of assignment |
0 points
did not demonstrate understanding of assignment requirements |
| Clarity; grammar & APA | 15 points
writing is clear and easy to follow; grammar and spelling are all correct; formatting gives a professional look and adds to readability, no APA style errors |
13.5 points
most ideas are presented clearly; occasional spelling and/or grammar issues, attempts in-text citation and reference list but 1 or 2 APA style errors are present |
10.5 points
wordy; some points require rereading to understand fully; more than an occasional spelling and/or grammar, attempts in-text citation and reference list; APA style errors are present; inconsistencies in citation usage can be found throughout the document |
9 points
unclear and difficult to understand; frequent spelling and grammar issues, attempts either in-text citation or reference list but omits the other |
0 points
Very difficult to understand, poorly written in terms of mechanics and structure |
| Overall Score | Outstanding
100 or more |
Superior
90 or more |
Good
70 or more |
Below Standard
60 or more |
Failure
0 or |
